Biological significance of sperm whale responses to sonar: Comparison with anti-predator responses

Author
Curé, Charlotte
Isojunno, Saana
Visser, Fleur
Wensveen, Paul J.
Sivle, Lise Doksæter
Kvadsheim, Petter Helgevold
Lam, Frans-Peter A.
Miller, Patrick J.O.
Date Issued
2016
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/590
https://publications.ffi.no/123456789/590
DOI
10.3354/esr00748
Collection
Articles
Description
Curé, Charlotte; Isojunno, Saana; Visser, Fleur; Wensveen, Paul J.; Sivle, Lise Doksæter; Kvadsheim, Petter Helgevold; Lam, Frans-Peter A.; Miller, Patrick J.O.. Biological significance of sperm whale responses to sonar: Comparison with anti-predator responses. Endangered Species Research 2016 ;Volum 31.(1) s. 89-102
n031p089.pdf
Size: 282k
Abstract
A key issue when investigating effects of anthropogenic noise on cetacean behavior is to identify the biological significance of the responses. Predator presence can be considered a natural high-level disturbance stimulus to which prey animals have evolved adaptive response strategies to reduce their risk of predation by altering behavior away from fitness-enhancing activities such as foraging. By contrasting the type and magnitude (duration, severity, consistency) of behavioral responses to anthropogenic noise and playback of killer whale (KW) sounds that simulated predator presence, this study aimed to provide a relative index of the disturbance level as an indication of the biological significance of responses to the anthropogenic stimulus. Using multi-sensor tags as well as visual observations of surface behavior of adult male sperm whales, we assessed a comprehensive range of behavioral metrics that could reduce individuals’ fitness if altered for a biologically relevant duration. Combining previously published results and new analyses, we showed that the responses to 1-2 kHz upsweep naval sonar and to KW playback were very similar, including horizontal avoidance, interruption of foraging or resting activities and an increase in social sound production. However, only KW playbacks elicited grouping behaviors, indicating that this social response component was specific to predator detection. Animals responded to a lesser extent to 6-7 kHz upsweep naval sonar, indicating weaker disturbance effects. Our study demonstrates the benefit of using anti-predator responses as a reference of disturbance when evaluating the relative impacts of anthropogenic stimuli, which can be of particular interest in studies of threatened species such as sperm whales.
View Meta Data